“privacy matter? I have ever heard of. That was a few people on Facebook have been problems, after they had their page are bragging about cheating during the exams. They had found the course itself … Who is so stupid to put something online? any case I do not! So my privacy matter, there is no problem “
Read more

For information about the functioning of the Commission, please contact the various categories in the left navigation. You can also use the search function for more specific searches.

In 2000, the privacy matter Protection Act (WBP), as a result of European privacy matter Directive 95/46/EC. This law is the successor of the earlier privacy matter Protection Act Registration (WPR). The WBP provides rules for the “wholly or partly automated processing of personal privacy matter and not the automatic processing of personal privacy matter in a filing system or intended to be included therein.”
Personal

Personal information is any information that a particular individual can be identified. The most famous example name and address. Also e-mail addresses and MSN such accounts are seen as personal. But privacy matter rate on a particular person, including by one’s IQ, can be personal where to locate the person that has IQ.

On the Internet is such a person given IP address. An IP address, along with a date and time of use of that address, trace back to one person. You as a provider of assistance is needed, but it can.
See also

* Photos and image rights

Someone’s picture is a given person. The subject is finally to be recognized. In addition to a picture to see what race someone is, and whether that person is male or female. According to the letter of the law is a picture also given a special person, so there’s extra processing photographs strict rules.
Processing of personal privacy matter

Processing is “any operation or set of actions relating to personal privacy matter.” The Act gives examples of the collection, recording, organization, storage, adaptation or alteration, retrieval, consultation, use, disclosure by transmission, dissemination or any other form of posting, together with each other, blocking, blocking, erasure or destruction of personal privacy matter.
The rules for processing personal privacy matter

The person, any processing of personal consent. He also has the right information is stored about him, to correct or withdraw. Organizations that handle personal privacy matter, explain how they do.
Prior authorization

Personal privacy matter may be processed in accordance with the rules of the WBP. The main rule is that the person must have given his consent for the processing. Request privacy matter on that person, it must be informed in advance about inclusion in the file. A registration form on a website must have a similar warning. Even when privacy matter are collected from other sources, the person must be informed at the time of recording or appearance just before the time of distribution to third parties. This does not work if the person knew that his information would be included.

It is not permitted to e-mail addresses of people who respond to your website to collect them to send mass e-mail, because making such a mailing is a form of processing. The company’s customers may Hotmail However massive e-mail, because the customers do in terms authorized. It is always the responsibility of the organization processing the privacy matter to the appropriate person to inform.

Also, personal privacy matter must be processed in accordance with the purposes for which it was obtained. The subscriber base for an Internet newsletter can therefore be used to send the newsletter around, but it should not be sold to another company for such a promotional mailing.
Accountability

All organizations that use personal privacy matter, have an information. This means that the persons to whom the privacy matter relate, have to know what they do with their privacy matter. This does not when it is obvious (eg completing a registration form at an online forum) or if it is very time consuming for the address of the person to find out.
Correction Law

Moreover, persons in a filing to the right to see their records. They may also request that their information correct, complete, are removed or blocked. That must be where the privacy matter used by the responsible factually inaccurate, incomplete or irrelevant to the purpose or purposes of the processing. A defaulter can not remove his personal requirements in the accounts receivable of a business.
Security Duty

Businesses that process, should take measures (technical and organizational) to prevent unauthorized access to get people here. In many cases, it is necessary to protect this information, eg passwords and encryption to apply to the privacy matterbase. By sending information (such as filling out forms) is often the use of secure Internet connections using SSL as recommended.
The privacy matter Protection Board

The privacy matter Protection Authority (CBP) monitors compliance with the privacy matter Protection Act. Processing of personal privacy matter must be notified here, unless one of the exemptions under the legislation concerned. Anyone who does not, it risks a fine.
Role of CBP

Monitoring compliance with the WBP is held by the privacy matter Protection Authority (CBP), formerly Registration Office. The CBP advises the government on the protection of personal privacy matter, perform investigations, key codes of conduct and privacy matter regulations and handles inquiries and complaints. CBP has the power to fine to distribute to organizations that violate the WBP. The registration of personal privacy matter files must be notified to the CBP.
Sign up for processing

Who commercially or through automatic privacy matter collection, the fact must do in CBP. A company does not, then the CBP impose a fine of 4,500 euros.
Exemptions

For some types of registrations, the law an exemption. Examples include personnel administration, accounting, administration of customers and suppliers, members administrations, administrations and administrations of subscription (former) students. However in such cases are limiting the information that it may be recorded.

The CBP has published a Handreiking Vrijstellingsbesluit containing explanations about the main exemptions. To name a few:

* Subscriptions: Publishers of publications (including electronic) have the records of personal privacy matter of their subscribers to sign up. They can not keep up than to provide the publications or the collection of the subscription is necessary.
* Scientific research and statistics: who is doing research and taking personal use, its privacy matterbase does not sign. Only the most necessary name and address can be tracked. privacy matter may not be provided to third parties, except with the consent or transfer is necessary for the investigation. Transfers to other research only if it can guarantee that the privacy matter can be used for anything else.
* Communications Files: processing of personal privacy matter necessary for communication need not be notified. The administrator of a forum or mailing list or subscriber base have been list members not to sign. However, he may not “sensitive personal privacy matter” (eg religion, health or political affiliations) store. The privacy matterbase should not be used for other purposes without the consent of the parties. The administrator of a forum of its privacy matter members may not give to advertisers.
* Network Systems: who manages a private network, users should keep records on the network to work for the security and internal control and maintenance and management. This includes things like ‘log’ what users do, the incoming and outgoing communications they carry (but not the content) or to record where they can and can not. Users should be informed about it. This does not apply to ISPs and other operators of public telecommunications networks! They should just sign their privacy matterbase.

Spam: Unsolicited Advertising
See also

* Spam finally banned

The circulation of unsolicited commercial e-mail, in the jargon as ‘spam’ called, may in principle only when the addressees have given their consent for inclusion in the file of the channel. It is forbidden to “automated calling systems without human intervention, faxes and electronic messages” for the transmission of unsolicited communications for commercial, voluntary or charitable purposes. This is the sending of unsolicited commercial e-mail is prohibited, but also via SMS advertising is no longer allowed. Does the sender do, there is proof to him that here the recipient has asked for permission beforehand.

At the moment it is only illegal to send spam to individuals, consumers do. By October 1, 2009 extended this ban. Foreign companies may then be sent out emails only after permission of the company.
E-mail addresses

A common practice is to collect Internet e-mail addresses from websites to an example file to build, especially for direct marketing purposes. This appears to conflict with the WBP. Clearing out of other people’s e-mail directory was banned in December 2002 because the e-mail directory in its terms forbade this.
Pedigree Research

More and more people, including the author of this article, publish their family tree on the Internet. The WBP makes an exception for the processing of personal privacy matter for personal use only. Collecting material for a pedigree, and making the tree itself may without the consent of the people in it are done. However, when the family is published on the Internet for example, is no longer any “personal use”. The above rules apply then.

However, the WBP is formally discussed privacy matter traceable to individuals. The law is not a deceased natural person (more). Therefore, the WBP not apply to deceased persons. Keep in mind that such partner or children of the deceased easily identify when sufficient information about the deceased itself is published. This information constitutes personal privacy matter of that partner or children. The WBP can sometimes apply.

privacy matter has to do with different disciplines such as ethics, information science and law.
Content

* 1 Ethics
* 2 Legislation
O 2.1 Netherlands
o 2.2 Belgium
o 2.3 European Union
3 * privacy matter versus Security
* 4 Pronunciation
* 5 Culture
* 6 Footnotes
* 7 See also
* 8 External links

[edit] Ethics

privacy matter is part of many ethical issues. There is often a tension between privacy matter and certain other interests, including combating criminal and undesirable behavior. For example, certain laws were introduced in the context of the war against terrorism (including the U.S. Patriot Act) for unsettled because it would affect citizens’ privacy matter. On the other hand, proponents claim that the loss of privacy matter that many other significant benefits, such as better fight terrorism, would yield. Another issue concerns personalization of computer systems. Again the question is whether the storage of data (loss of privacy matter) outweighs the benefits of better personalized computer functionality.

Ethics is not formally binding, but legislation. Legal standards are partly based on ethical considerations of the legislature. Ethics law may go beyond: not anything indecent, so unethical, is unlawful.

See also: Biometrics, data retention
[edit] Legislation

The right to privacy matter is guaranteed in various international treaties. Article 17 of the UN Convention on Civil and Political Rights of 1966 states:

1. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy matter, family, home and correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honor and reputation.
2. Everyone is entitled to protection by the law against such interference or attacks.

Similarly, Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights guarantees these rights. Citizens in European countries may join the Convention in this court. The way it varies by country. In the Netherlands this Convention, like all international treaties take precedence over national legislation. In Germany, the ECHR has no precedence, but the same position as other laws. By contrast, the Netherlands, the ECHR is important because laws to the Constitution may not be reviewed, while in Germany is the case, and there is even a separate dish for.
[edit] Netherlands

In the Netherlands the right to privacy matter enshrined in Articles 10 to 13 of the Dutch Constitution. An important part of privacy matter, the processing of personal data, since September 1, 2001 is largely regulated in the Data Protection Act (WBP). Previously it was in the Data Protection Act (WPR) regularly. Besides the PDPA regulate inter alia the Police Registers Act and the Law Municipal Database data protection.

The organization concerned with the privacy matter of the people involved are the Dutch Data Protection Board (CBP). Furthermore, following private organizations still active: Bits of Freedom (privacy matter on the Internet), privacy matter Invasion and Buro Jansen & Janssen.
[edit] Belgium

In Belgium the right to privacy matter enshrined in Article 22 of the Belgian Constitution. The matter is further regulated by the Act of December 8, 1992 for the protection of privacy matter in relation to the processing of personal data, the Royal Decree of February 13, 2001 implementing the Law of December 8, 1992 on the protection of privacy matter are relation to the processing of personal data and the Royal Decree of 17 December 2003 laying down detailed rules concerning the composition and functioning of certain sectoral committees within the Commission for the protection of privacy matter.

Responsible for monitoring is an independent government body, Commission for the protection of privacy matter (CBPL) called.
[edit] European Union

Within the other countries of the European Union following public institutions responsible for each Member State privacy matter Policy:

* Bulgaria: Commission for Personal Data Protection
* Cyprus: Office of the Commissioner for Personal Data Protection
* Denmark: Datatilsynet
* Germany: Der Bundesbeauftragte für den Datenschutz
* Estonia: Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate
* Finland: Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto
* France: Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés
* Greece: Personal Data Protection Authority
* Hungary: Parliamentary Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information Hungary
* Ireland: Data Protection Commissioner
* Italy: Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
* Latvia: Datu valsts inspekcija
* Lithuania: Valstybine duomenu apsaugos inspekcija
* Luxembourg: Commission nationale pour la protection des données
* Malta: Office of the Commissioner for Data Protection
* Austria: Datenschutzkommission
* Poland: Generalny Inspektor Ochrony danych Osobowych
* Portugal: Commissão Nacional de Protecção de dados
* Romania: National Authority for the Supervision of Personal Data Processing
* Slovenia: Urad varuha clovekovih pravic
* Slovakia: Úrad after ochranu osobných údajov
* Spain: Agencia de Protección de Datos
* Czech Republic: Úrad pro ochranu osobních údaju
* United Kingdom: Data Protection Register
* Sweden: Datainspektionen

[edit] privacy matter vs Security

The increasing proliferation of laws and rules resulting from (among others) terrorism (Security) leads to an increasing number of actions that seem contrary to the principle of privacy matter. To avoid breach of privacy matter can occur, the government will attempt to surround these measures to safeguard against the uncontrolled use. Based on the assumption that terrorism against infringement of privacy matter may imply increasing the security measures the privacy matter principles. The collection of data ever leads to a profile for every citizen. Based on this profile can be effected. The government and its departments can make mistakes or does not properly secure. This increases the privacy matter again. privacy matter and security are not fully compatible with each other.
[edit] Pronunciation

The English borrowed the word privacy matter in the Dutch usually pronounced praaivasi (pra?v?si ?), influenced by the U.S. English version. The British English pronunciation is privvasi (pr?v?si ?).
[edit] Culture

The quest for privacy matter, the lack of privacy matter in small and large communities and the consequences are recurrent themes in literature and film, ranging from the hofintriges in the Pillow Book of Sei Shonagon around the year 1000, and the glorification of the selfless community in Utopia of Thomas More in 1516, to seeing the steel look in the eyes of Big Brother in 1984 by George Orwell in 1949, which describes an extreme dystopia. In the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley is a society where no life is outlined: “everyone belongs to everyone else”.

Somebody’s Watching Me is the debut album by American R & B artist Rockwell in 1984, son of Motown founder Berry Gordy and brother of Jermaine Jackson, who along with his brother Michael on the chorus sings the eponymous title track, a top 3 hit in several countries, including the Netherlands. [1] The singer expresses the feeling that he is watched constantly beaten, the neighbor and the mailman spying on him and he dares to undertake nothing, “I can not enjoy my tea!”.

Sneakers is a film by Phil Alden Robinson from 1992 with, among others, Ben Kingsley and Sidney Poitier as a group of squatters master the boundaries of the search of computer security. A sneaker is a hacker. Team leader Robert Redford has been living under a pseudonym years and looking for a guarantee his anonymity.